Historical Roots Of The New Zealand - 1369 Words

Reading Response Assignment Throughout New Zealand history, historical roots have played a significant role in the development of modern Aotearoa New Zealand. The historical past has shaped various forms of present social dimensions within the nation today. This essay intends to discuss the controversial racial inequality in regards to the relationship between Maori and Pakeha within contemporary New Zealand society. This essay will explore two readings; â€Å"Plunder in the Promised Land: MÄ ori Land Alienation and the Genesis of Capitalism in Aotearoa New Zealand† by Wynyard, Matthew and â€Å"Stereotypical Construction of the Maori ‘Race’ in the Media† by Wall, Melanie. This essay will also further discuss a brief summary on my personal reflection†¦show more content†¦The three sections discuss the impact of systematic dispossession of Maori land in Aotearoa New Zealand during the nineteenth and early twentieth century. The first section, Wynyard draws on Marx’s t heory of primitive accumulation. Primitive accumulation in the New Zealand context is perceived as an alienation of Maori land for colonial settlers. Likewise, it represents a countless amount of force, fraud, and oppression towards Maori in order to operate a capital accumulation. In other words, it is a form of cultural theft in stealing Maori lands and resources (Heim, 1998). Thus, primitive accumulation causes indigenous Maori left with nothing besides selling themselves as labor to work for the European civilization. This concept is similar to how capitalism was formed in the early colonization in Europe through the same progress of stealing the land and the development of agriculture. The second section, Wynyard covers the case of the Native Land Court where he titled the section as the Theft made legal. The Native Land Court is an intention of freeing up the so-called Theft in obtaining legal act through creating the law in a way to benefit the settlers. The main mean of this act is to maintain the system of British law. This law is launched to completely destroy and ignore the Maori laws through establishing courts, institution and land acts that permit them toShow MoreRelatedWilliam Satchell s The Toll Of The Bush And Hamish Clayton s Wulf Essay1460 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Satchell’s The Toll of the Bush and Hamish Clayton’s Wulf are novels that explore the New Zealand landscape through its physicality and the state of the people within its environs. The Toll of the Bush takes place in the Hokianga district at the turn of the nineteenth century. This is a world in transition; the clearing and trade in kauri is shifting to that of a farming community. In contrast, Wulf is set almost a century earlier in a time of exploration and discovery. The sailors in Clayton’sRead MoreThe Treaty Of Waitangi And New Zealand Essay1555 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction The Treaty of Waitangi is one of the most important documents in relation to New Zealand’s political and social history. It set out an important agreement between the British Crown and the native inhabitants of New Zealand, the Maori (Waitangi Tribunal, n.d.). This agreement established Crown rights over the land of New Zealand and, for the Maori, the guarantee of the protection of their interests as well as giving them the same rights as the British settlers (Ministry for Culture andRead MoreHealth Promotion Of Nz Women s Health Essay1206 Words   |  5 PagesKaylene Tribe Introduction The Health Promotion Agency’s (HPA) â€Å"Don’t know? Don’t drink† movement aims to stop women from drinking anytime during pregnancy to reduce the potential harm that it can give to the unborn child (AlcoholNZ, 2015). New Zealand’s society has become more tolerant to regular alcohol consumption, which results to the increasing rate of women, especially young women who drinks alcohol while they’re pregnant. If a woman doesn’t know that she is pregnant, or is pregnantRead MoreThe Health Issues Of Inequalities Within Healthcare Interaction Between Maoris And Non- Maoris Essay1550 Words   |  7 PagesIn this paper will shows the health issues of Inequalities within healthcare interaction between Maoris and non- Maoris in New Zealand, barriers in resolving the issues and measurement being implemented to solve this issue. Globally, healthcare practitioners encounter health issues whenever and wherever they work. There are common health issues practitioners may come across wherever they work such as inequalities within healthcare interactions; different cultures, practice, values and believe ofRead MoreInnovation And Management Of Technological Development Essay1543 Words   |   7 Pages Proposal to Include Innovation and Management of Technological Development in the New Zealand Technology Curriculum Barbara Clarke TEMS340-16A Our current New Zealand Technology learning area aims to develop in students â€Å"a broad technological literacy that will equip them to participate in society as informed citizens and give them access to technology-related careers† (Ministry of Education, 2007, p. 32). Through the learning opportunities in each of three distinct strands: Technological PracticeRead More The Truth About SARS Essay917 Words   |  4 PagesThe Truth About SARS People in general are both fascinated and paranoid of the onset of new infectious diseases. While films such as Outbreak are smash hits at the box office, when an actual disease becomes apparent people often react with a kind of mass hysteria. Last year, a new illness reared its evil head. While the name SARS has become fairly well-known, the actual facts behind the illness are not as widely talked about. SARS is an acronym for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. TheRead MoreAn Assignment : Fine Art1804 Words   |  8 PagesAssignment One: Fine Art What influenced these paintings? Would these same messages translate through time if the paintings swapped places in history? Fine art is more than just paint on canvas. Historical events, social, educational and physical experiences of the artist season their work and influence the way the artist transcribes messages to the viewer, influencing their ability to receive those messages. Two oil paintings containing the same subject matter can be incredibly similar and yetRead MoreThe Role Of Registered Nurses1700 Words   |  7 PagesThroughout time there have been many historical and political factors that have influenced the Australian healthcare system and shaped the role of Registered Nurses. As healthcare professionals within this system, it is important for RNs to maintain a contemporary understanding of key influences. For example, Florence Nightingale is one of the main historical factors which has played a major role in impacting the way nursing is approached and how nurses c an advocate for patients to provide a properRead MoreIs Parihaka Day A Day Of Our Nation?2242 Words   |  9 Pagesconsiderations on the bill, supported by the evidence from the research of academics, secondary sources such as articles and opinion blogs, along with statistical information: Firstly, we will present evidence on why Parihaka was important to New Zealand, and is still important to this day, in support of the creation of â€Å"Parihaka Day†, as outlined in Clause 5 of the bill - Kiwis love public holidays, as shown by cross-house support for the â€Å"mondayisation† bill in 2013 (NZ Parliament, 2013). ButRead MoreEssay on National Security Strategy Comparison1175 Words   |  5 Pagescultures (Rubenstein, 2011, 1). Both the US and Europe are ethnically and racially diverse. Many marvel at the ability to retain direction and focus in the face of such diversity. Early America molded immigrants into a â€Å"melting pot†, mixing historical roots into a soup that became distinctly â€Å"American†. Nowadays, the preference is to hold on to ethnic differences and describe the result as a â€Å"mosaic† or â€Å"salad bowl† – separate pieces that, when viewed as a whole, create a larger picture (Branigin

A Child Between Two Borders Essay - 1633 Words

A Child Between Two Borders Swinging back and forth, a five-year-old child plays innocently on the monkey bars thinking only of whats for lunch. Im sure all of you can remember blissfully innocent times like these. Everything seemed so much simpler. The stresses of finding jobs, paying bills, and handling lifes other complexities were nonexistent. When you really look back, that image of innocence is a more crucial time than you previously thought. It was during times like these that I, like others before me, developed into the man I am today. The mind of a young person is malleable; one continues growing and redefining oneself all the way through adolescence and beyond. Perhaps the largest obstacle to be conquered during childhood†¦show more content†¦Like any other child, I grew up playing with dinosaurs, digging in the sand box, and exploring the world with the graceful eyes of innocence. It wasnt the basic desires and behavior that set me apart from other children, but rather the customs that I had acquired through my parents. I did not know many other children who could interchange Spanish slang with British idioms. Tea times and partaking in Latino cultural dances were both a part of my childhood. At school, I interacted with predominantly Anglo-American children. In contrast, my friends outside school could fall into one of two categories. They were either of Cuban or Mexican descent. During the week I spoke English, and on Saturday and Sunday, Spanish was my tongue. Oblivious to the unique nature that I had developed, my life seemed normal to me. Like all things in life, change was about to occur. As I matured, the distinct worlds of home and school began to merge; no longer could I differentiate between the two. I attended a predominantly Caucasian preparatory high school where the idea of financial limitations was nonexistent. This was a far cry from the type of life my mother and her family had lived. For much of her youth, the stresses of being a migrant laborer occupied her life. My father had also come from a humble background. Thus, I was raised with the work ethic being the most cherished of principles. For many at school, this value was foreign.Show MoreRelatedRelationship Between An Individual s Work And Home Environment1295 Words   |  6 Pagestoday’s industrial revolution as it is the relationship between an individual’s work/family commitments, thus having an impact on their behaviour between their work and home environment. Offering employees an satisfactory equilibrium allows them to balance the ir primary priorities which they have in their current employment position as well as maintaining their lifestyle outside of their position (Armstrong, 2014). Reasonably, an imbalance between organisational, individual commitments and inefficaciousRead MoreSocial And Cultural Groups Become A Key Tool For Harmony On The Global Stage1601 Words   |  7 Pages the borders of the global nations are quickly being re-established with determination. It is in this time that the anthropological examinations of various social and cultural groups become a key tool for harmony on the global stage. It is through the dissection of data collected through fieldwork that true anthropological understanding other cultures is best achieved. This essay will reflect on the anthropological contributions of two writers who have both touched on the issues of borders and howRead MoreIllegal Immigrants : An Illegal Immigrant1505 Words   |  7 Pagesarrives at the national border of Mexico and United States, then she have to get across the border without anyone founds out, because she is not legally to do that, anyway. The most important reason to move to America is to have much better living conditions for her and the kids. There are so many other reasons to be an illegal immigrant, such as, money issue, family and/or personal reasons. Therefore, there are really thousands of people who are illegally getting across our borders, especially the SouthernRead MoreThe Problem Of Illegal Immigration1508 Words   |  7 Pagesaccept illegal immigrants. Because illegal immigrants have been increasing since 1980, especially from Mexico, the most useful solutions to help the United States government to reduce illegal immigrants are not giving newborns U.S citizenship, forcing border guards to be more active, and stop hiring illegal immigrants. Generally, for a long time the United States has complained about the huge number of illegal immigrants that come from Mexico and have found it difficult to block them. According to ZongRead MoreThe Blurred Line Between Truth and Lie1200 Words   |  5 PagesThe Blurred Line Between Truth and Lie Delirium by Lauren Oliver is a dark and alluring novel that wanders back and forth between the blurred lines of truth and lie. The main character--Lena, falls in love in a dystopian society where love is seen as a disease, amor deliria nervosa. â€Å"On your eighteenth birthday...you will get cured and will be happy forever...† â€Å"it is the deadliest of all deadly things: It kills you both when you have it and when you don’t...†(pg.4) While the hallucinated worldRead MoreThe Business Of Modern Day Slavery And Drug Trafficking1139 Words   |  5 Pagesexploitation†(www.unescap.org). There are many forms of trafficking: sexual exploitation, including prostitution and pornography; forced labor, including agriculture, manufacturing (sweatshop), domestic servitude, fishing; forced marriage and illegal adoption; child soldiers; and organ trafficking (Al Jabal 48). The drug trade plays a major part in human trafficking by using drugs to recruit, retain, an d exploit their victims. Runaway teens, both male and female, are the most targeted and most vulnerable. SomeRead MoreIn Regards To The Daca And Dapa Programs, President Obama1517 Words   |  7 Pagesrecord number of unaccompanied child migrants from Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador apprehended at the U.S.-Mexico border the summer of 2014. These young people hoped to flee from violence, and poverty affecting their countries. This wave of migrants garnered a lot of attention due to the fact that in the first half of 2014, more than 57,000 children arrived in the U.S. This was more than twice the number of arrivals as the ones that made it to the U.S.-Mexico border in all of the fiscal year ofRead MoreThe Silence Of Death By Chang Rae Lee Essay1644 Words   |  7 Pagesof Henry’s mother leads to a greater gap between Henry and his father. A common motif that Lee uses is the silence of the characters most affected by the death. In each case, the characters refuse to con front their loss and attempt to move on with life as if nothing happened. Since each instance causes conflict, Lee comments on the dangers of cultural difference regarding the handling of death. Lee illustrates that it is necessary to cross the border of understanding how cultures handle certainRead MoreThe Poverty Of Haiti And The United States1484 Words   |  6 Pageschildren are trapped in domestic labor. Three fourths of them being girls and most between the ages of 5 and 14.† (para1) The parents of these children give them to a host familie, one of the reasons why they do that is because they don t have enough money to raise the child at hand. The children usually go to a host family who has money. The sending families also say that learning how to work can be good for a child. Throughout Haiti there is a widespread idea that these children are safe with theRead MoreShould English For Replace Bilingual Education1483 Words   |  6 Pageswith them. I have chosen to do my research on â€Å"Should English immersions replace bilingual education†. This topic interested me as soon as I saw it because it is something I can relate to. When I was a child, my parents brought my brother and I to the United States. We lived right across the border from Eagle Pass, Texas which is where I live today. I was able to start school at a kinder garden level. My family’s native language has always Spanish. When I started school, I did not know one single

Renaissance paintings reviews Essay Example For Students

Renaissance paintings reviews Essay Holy usuries wore halos to signify their divinity, While hieratic scale is used to indicate their importance. Compare and contrast Cambiums Madonna Enthroned and Egoistic Assassinate Madonna. What was so innovative about Gustos approach, and why was it so significant? Cambium used the Italy-Byzantine style of art with unrealistic depictions and characteristics. U can clearly see that Mars face has no real volume with little or no depth within the work All of the Angels faces are very flat 2 dimensional and almost like scratch)ins. Her drapery and shape has no real form and she sort of just looks to be set in place. In the Assassinating Madonna, Gustos efforts have created a work that has so much humanism to it with detailing and 3 dimensionality to the characters looks. The way he ads depth by adjusting all Of the Angels in place to show space and surround her throne you can clearly see the depth inside her throne and in relation to size you can see Madonnas figure and shape curving in her throne as well as her drapery that flows very smoothly against her body. All together in comes together very gracefully. Describe the subject matter of Gustos Lamentation. What specific techniques did Ghetto use to humanism the story? When look at this pace of art feel a sense of sadness, trouble and disparity. Everyone in the image is mourning Jesus Christ as he is gently being held by 3 women. Everyones hand gestures suggest the worry and heartache that you can assume they are dealing with. The figures in the foreground are clearly human. His understanding and appreciation of human form is expressed through free flowing clothing that reveals volumes The textures of the clothing appear soft, and smooth against the contrasting rough bumpy rock surfaces surrounding them. He clearly has made a Statement of separating the look of a human in contract to the Angels floating above who seem more cartoonist. Each persons facial expressions is proven With either lines, wrinkles or kick in their eyes His work is something that he wanted to be stand out and be something that is new and that he would be known for.

Marijuana, Users, & What You Lose Essays - Entheogens, Cannabis

Marijuana, Users, & What You Lose The topic of marijuana use is very broad and has an intricate effect on society as a whole, however, for the purpose of this paper; the literature review is based on facts covering a brief overview of the existence, use, and effect of marijuana. The history of the Cannabis plant and the outcomes associated with the use and abuse of marijuana is the major focus of this paper. What Is Marijuana? Marijuana is a drug obtained from dried and crumpled parts of the hemp plant Cannabis. Cannabis is botanically classified as a member of the family Cannabaceae and the genus Cannabis. There are 3 known species of Cannabis: Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica, and Cannabis ruderalis. (Lorimer 214) Cannabis sativa is a tall plant, generally between 8 and 12 feet. The leaves have long thin fingers and are light green. The more equatorial varieties have more yellow pigments to protect the plant from intense light. Sativa seed pods are long and thin and turn red as they mature in a warm environment. In cooler environments, the buds may be slightly purple. Sativa plants smell sweet and fruity and the smoke is generally quite mild. (Grolier Electronic Encyclopedia) For thousands of years, the plant cannabis sativa, otherwise known as hemp or marijuana, has been harvested by people and utilized in many different ways. It has been grown to provide food for villages and towns, and used for clothes, rope, and sails on early ships. The Bible was written on hemp paper, as well as the first draft of the US Constitution. (House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Ninth Report 1998) Marijuana is known by a variety of names such as kif (Morocco), dagga (South Africa), and bhang (India). Common in the United States, marijuana is called pot, grass, weed, Mary Jane, bones, etc. (Lorimer 214) The plant contains THC, which gives smokers the psychic effects they seek. The leaves of this plant are smoked but the most highly prized part of the plant is the top, smoked by rolling inside tobacco paper or placing in a pipe. (Grolier Electronic Encyclopedia) It is consumed worldwide by an estimated 200,000,000 persons for pleasure, an escape from re ality, or relaxation. (Berger) The use of marijuana is widespread by all classes, races, and cultures. (Smith) The first definite record of the marijuana plant in the New World dates from 1545 AD, when the Spaniards introduced it into Chile. It has been suggested, however, that African slaves familiar with marijuana as an intoxicant and medicine brought the seeds with them to Brazil even earlier in the sixteenth century. (Lorimer 215) There are no records that the Pilgrims brought marijuana with them to Plymouth, but the Native Americans introduced the Pilgrims to tobacco and other forms of drugs such as Marijuana. The Jamestown settlers did bring the plant to Virginia in 1611, and cultivated it for its fiber, the hemp, which was used to make rope. (Erriod's Cannabis Vault) Marijuana was introduced into New England in 1629 and from then until after the Civil War, the marijuana plant was a major crop in North America. The Marijuana Plant played an important role in both colonial and national economic policy. In 1762, Virginia awarded bounties for hemp culture and manufacture, and imposed penalties upon those who did not produce it. George Washington was growing hemp at Mount Vernon three years later, presumably for its fiber. The fact has been argued that Washington was also concerned to increase the medicinal or intoxicating potency of his marijuana plants. The argument depends on a curious tradition, which may or may not be sound, that the quality or quantity of marijuana resin (hashish) is enhanced if the male and female plants are separated before the females are pollinated. There can be no doubt that Washington separated the males from the females. Two entries in his diary supply the evidence: May 12-13, 1765: Sowed Hemp at Muddy hole by Swamp. (Andrews 34) August 7, 1765: `-began to separate the Male from the Female Hemp Do-rather too late. (Andrews 34) Washington's August 7 diary entry clea rly indicates that he was cultivating the plant for medicinal purposes as well for it's fiber.

To See or Not to See Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth Essay Example

To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth Essay To see or not to see Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth 2009. 12. 14. Literary criticism has ever been a touchy subject. Throughout cultural history we have seen critics of various shapes and sizes commenting on all works of art in vastly different ways, from the condescending to the rave, the profound to the sarcastic – and all of them were right, in one sense. For a critic is a â€Å"voice of the masses†, a representative of readers everywhere, thus whatever opinion a critic has is justified by him having actually seen, read, interpreted and/or digested the given masterpiece, and being moved by it to such an extent as to express this in a verbal form. A true critic, however, is slightly more than that – he possesses a stable sense of cultural value, and the ability to pinpoint the exact place of any artificial creation in the golden canon of immortality, not to mention a sense of humour and a devout humility towards art in general. We will write a custom essay sample on To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Francis Jeffrey (1773-1850) was all these things and more – though admittedly he didn’t bear all the afore-mentioned qualities in equal measure. Even so, owing to his editorship and contributions at the Edinburgh Review, he was undoubtedly one of the most well-known critics of his age (and maybe since then), his utmost concern being to mould public taste in an intelligent and elegant way. And this is how he actually managed to influence the literature he was so keen on dissecting, and whose influence made him write in the first place; so presenting us with the old symbol of a snake biting its tail, one melting into the other, each affecting and being affected by its partner. Jeffrey’s judgements – both well-deserved and slightly less so – were something to be reckoned with, and several notable literary personages of the time can thank him for the growing (or diminishing) number of their readers, serving as an excellent example of what a critic might accomplish. Three personages are often mentioned in connection with Jeffrey, three men whose works became even more interconnected with his than the rest of the prestigious number he commented on. Jeffrey and Carlyle had an ambiguous relationship, with Jeffrey recognizing the genius of Carlyle early in his career, and going out of his way to present him with opportunities to flourish, while the different personalities of the two men – Jeffrey’s benign curiosity about the younger man’s affairs, and Carlyle’s independence – presented themselves in conflicts of varying intensity. Jeffrey and Dickens, on the other hand, had no major opposition of will, although this may be due to the fact that Jeffrey was an older and slightly kinder critic by the time they met. But neither of these relationships can compare, or even contrast, with the one Jeffrey had with William Wordsworth (1770-1850). Jeffrey had, from the start, a very strong opinion about Wordsworth – indeed, there are scarcely any criticisms left us which present such an unmasked feeling of dissatisfaction with a poet as his reviews about Wordsworth’s poems. The significance of these reviews is two-fold: on the one hand, they paint a vibrant picture of what the philosophy and idealism of the Lake Poets, and the morality of the Scottish Whig cultural elite, actually was like; on the other hand, Jeffrey’s unique style, made up of sarcasm, wit, elegance, and a slightly biased opinion, offer an insight to his mind, personal experience and ethics. In other words, Jeffrey’s reviews present themselves as a luxurious â€Å"feast for the soul and mind†, both contextually and stylistically speaking. In the following, we are going to look at two reviews, one from 1807, the other from 1822 – one of the first and last reviews concerned with Wordsworth and the Poets of the Lakes. Wordsworth’s Poems, published in 1807, move Jeffrey to express his disappointment with and worries over the new poetic style used therein in no uncertain form (though still much more mildly than in later years! ). He begins by mentioning the Lake Poets and the popularity of the Lyrical Ballads – and gently implies that success, however well-deserved, does not erase the many faults of the volume (i. . vulgarity, silliness). He goes on to state that these attributes are not in themselves worth any value, and therefore shouldn’t be seen as (aesthetic) virtues in any case. After this introduction, he moves on to the poems in question, and concludes that Wordsworth’s volume has settled the argument concerning literary merit in a definite way – so definite, in fact, that Jeffrey washes his hands, so to speak, and places the matter before the public (as if it weren’t already there), to decide for themselves whether Wordsworth’s Poems are worth something or not. Following this verdict, Jeffrey starts illustrating his opinion by moralizing about poetry in general, defining it as something that gives the reader â€Å"pleasure†, which can be divided into three parts: „that which we receive from the excitement of Passion or emotion — that which is derived from the play of Imagination, or the easy exercise of Reason — and that which depends on the character and qualities the Diction. † Diction, it seems, deserved some further introduction, for apparently this is what Jeffrey found most lacking in Poems. It becomes clear that in the critic’s opinion, true diction is elegant, dignified, appropriate – today we would probably add, conventional. The review laments the disuse of diction in the Lakeside fraternity, the disregard of classical sources and preference for the ordinary, the mundane. This latter tendency is also pointed out in relation to Poems’ topics, where Jeffrey emphasizes that the everyday subjects mentioned cannot actually be admitted as touching or sublime with a straight face. In his conclusion, Jeffrey admits that Wordsworth’s talents do shine through most of his works, making it doubly disappointing that they have to make do with such â€Å"trash†, and finishes by expressing a hope for the abortion of such â€Å"violation of the established laws of poetry†. Looking at the review from a stylistic point of view, Jeffrey is not as outspoken as he will be on following occasions, choosing instead to provide a poetical background philosophy to justify his negative impressions. Towards the end, however, he narrows his range of vision more and more from the general to the particular; and we can see the moraliser turn gradually into the critic, who doesn’t veil or justify his opinions thoroughly, but chooses rather to present them forcibly, with strong words and expressions (e. g. trash, folly, etc. ). Structurally speaking, the review is well-built, and conveys a false impression of impartiality with its units of refutation, exploration and conclusion, while in fact the personal opinion of the critic can clearly be felt in every instance of his well-composed sentences. But this, of course, was Jeffrey’s forte – to insinuate his own feelings even when seeming completely neutral. This tendency can well be observed also in the review of Wordsworth’s Memorials of a Tour, published in 1822. Note that fifteen years have passed, a significant period of time in contemporary literature – the new-fangled notions to which Jeffrey had objected previously had grown roots, even flourished somewhat; however, the opposition never altered its opinion: probably the most famous review of Jeffrey on Wordsworth, the one concerning The Excursion (published in 1814), opening with the line â€Å"This will never do! , is the best example of them still maintaining differences. During these years, Jeffrey used his wit and sarcasm to great effect, succeeding in shaking the reputations of Wordsworth and others considerably, albeit giving them considerable publicity at the same time. This review, however, is slightly different – although stil l wittily disapproving, it again includes the reader significantly, much like the one previously mentioned. Jeffrey – always a man of spectacular openers – starts off with the sentence: â€Å"The Lake School of Poetry, we think, is now pretty nearly extinct. . No gentlemanly reserve in his tone now – he follows up by separating Wordsworth from the fraternity, disclosing that now even they won’t admit him as belonging to them (though how someone could â€Å"belong† to a dead fraternity stays undecided), owing to his backward style, which even the inserted phrases of Milton or the Holy Writ can’t help (Jeffrey’s appreciation of these venerable sources clearly shines through his words on the subject). The second paragraph explains that while most of the compositions begin promisingly, the misguided author mostly succeeds in ruining them by saying nothing, or – even worse – by saying something totally ordinary in an â€Å"unintelligible way†, which, it seems, is one of the major sins against poetry itself. It soon becomes clear that the main concern of Jeffrey is that the sonnets of which the Memorial is composed are puzzling, and hard to understand; that Wordsworth insists on choosing the most unworthy objects to evoke startling fantasies or visions; and most of all, that the politics of the author leave much to be required. For a large part of the review is devoted to a sarcastic account of how Wordsworth depicted Napoleon, and how his sources for political and historical facts mainly consist of newspapers (the Morning Post is specifically mentioned). Following this, even the author’s reference to Milton becomes an object for derision (â€Å"Of a truth, it is a dangerous experiment in Mr. Wordsworth to recall his reader’s notice to Milton when he writes sonnets. †). Loftiness and high emotion are interpreted as pretension and impotence; however, Jeffrey again points out that even this volume has its merits, and that gems of beauty can indeed be found â€Å"†¦when [the author] is pleased to be plain and rational†. This review differs slightly from the previous one in style – Jeffrey does not give reasons for his verdicts any more, but declares his opinion in a straight, and sometimes still respectful manner. He constantly refers to contemporary matters, from affairs of the life of Wordsworth himself (Stamp-office) to the knowledge of the reader about important dates. We can see that this is a somewhat different approach than before – in 1807, he called on the reader to act as a dignified judge of literary value; now, he speaks out to him as a friend, someone with knowledge and experience similar to his own. The linguistic style of the review emphasizes this familiarity by often choosing sarcasm instead of elegance, or maybe not even that, just â€Å"plain† speech, only using flowing phrases when the context requires it. This tendency – although significant – is unsurprising, given that Jeffrey and his readership had, by now, more than fifteen years to grow familiar in. The single largest factor which ties both reviews together is, of course, the undervaluation of Wordsworth as a poet. One might well ask that how could a critic, any critic, of such taste and pedigree not recognize the genius of Wordsworth, and still be remembered by following generations as a critic of any value. There could be many answers to this question: one could simply shrug it off by saying contemporary critics very rarely discover the true talents of their times; or that Jeffrey’s enjoyable style is worthy of remembrance anywhere, notwithstanding his misjudged opinions. We could even say that badmouthing Wordsworth was Jeffrey’s one most significant achievement, which in itself constitutes a right to be remembered. The truth, however, lies somewhere deeper than that. For the reason to remember Jeffrey is Wordsworth himself – it is generally accepted that the critic’s judgements affected not only the criticized works’ afterlives, but the poet’s work as well. Wordsworth didn’t heed Jeffrey’s intimations, but they affected him slightly; he responded to the attacks, and defended himself as well as he could, on all grounds Jeffrey has challenged him: morality, philosophy, aesthetics and ethics, stating that contemporary reception cannot serve as a guideline for the future, but should be moulded and refined enough to accept these compositions according to their value. And so the symbiosis continued, with the works of Jeffrey and Wordsworth – although different in genre – growing ever more interconnected. And this is the most important reason why we have to remember Jeffrey: his impact on the Lake Poet’s work will last for ever, even when sarcasm seems outdated, classical references tedious, and elaborate language unnecessary. We can conclude that Jeffrey, even if he hadn’t managed to recognize Wordsworth, stated his opinion in a way worthy of his foe – noone needs to be ashamed of him; for although his sense of humour was limited, his humility likewise, and his ability to pinpoint immortal values a bit shoddy, he was – and remains – a force to be reckoned with. An eternal reminder that, whatever our opinions are, they will always have value and impact towards the one they are aimed at. To See or Not to See Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth Essay Example To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth Essay To see or not to see Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth 2009. 12. 14. Literary criticism has ever been a touchy subject. Throughout cultural history we have seen critics of various shapes and sizes commenting on all works of art in vastly different ways, from the condescending to the rave, the profound to the sarcastic – and all of them were right, in one sense. For a critic is a â€Å"voice of the masses†, a representative of readers everywhere, thus whatever opinion a critic has is justified by him having actually seen, read, interpreted and/or digested the given masterpiece, and being moved by it to such an extent as to express this in a verbal form. A true critic, however, is slightly more than that – he possesses a stable sense of cultural value, and the ability to pinpoint the exact place of any artificial creation in the golden canon of immortality, not to mention a sense of humour and a devout humility towards art in general. We will write a custom essay sample on To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on To See or Not to See: Francis Jeffrey on William Wordsworth specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Francis Jeffrey (1773-1850) was all these things and more – though admittedly he didn’t bear all the afore-mentioned qualities in equal measure. Even so, owing to his editorship and contributions at the Edinburgh Review, he was undoubtedly one of the most well-known critics of his age (and maybe since then), his utmost concern being to mould public taste in an intelligent and elegant way. And this is how he actually managed to influence the literature he was so keen on dissecting, and whose influence made him write in the first place; so presenting us with the old symbol of a snake biting its tail, one melting into the other, each affecting and being affected by its partner. Jeffrey’s judgements – both well-deserved and slightly less so – were something to be reckoned with, and several notable literary personages of the time can thank him for the growing (or diminishing) number of their readers, serving as an excellent example of what a critic might accomplish. Three personages are often mentioned in connection with Jeffrey, three men whose works became even more interconnected with his than the rest of the prestigious number he commented on. Jeffrey and Carlyle had an ambiguous relationship, with Jeffrey recognizing the genius of Carlyle early in his career, and going out of his way to present him with opportunities to flourish, while the different personalities of the two men – Jeffrey’s benign curiosity about the younger man’s affairs, and Carlyle’s independence – presented themselves in conflicts of varying intensity. Jeffrey and Dickens, on the other hand, had no major opposition of will, although this may be due to the fact that Jeffrey was an older and slightly kinder critic by the time they met. But neither of these relationships can compare, or even contrast, with the one Jeffrey had with William Wordsworth (1770-1850). Jeffrey had, from the start, a very strong opinion about Wordsworth – indeed, there are scarcely any criticisms left us which present such an unmasked feeling of dissatisfaction with a poet as his reviews about Wordsworth’s poems. The significance of these reviews is two-fold: on the one hand, they paint a vibrant picture of what the philosophy and idealism of the Lake Poets, and the morality of the Scottish Whig cultural elite, actually was like; on the other hand, Jeffrey’s unique style, made up of sarcasm, wit, elegance, and a slightly biased opinion, offer an insight to his mind, personal experience and ethics. In other words, Jeffrey’s reviews present themselves as a luxurious â€Å"feast for the soul and mind†, both contextually and stylistically speaking. In the following, we are going to look at two reviews, one from 1807, the other from 1822 – one of the first and last reviews concerned with Wordsworth and the Poets of the Lakes. Wordsworth’s Poems, published in 1807, move Jeffrey to express his disappointment with and worries over the new poetic style used therein in no uncertain form (though still much more mildly than in later years! ). He begins by mentioning the Lake Poets and the popularity of the Lyrical Ballads – and gently implies that success, however well-deserved, does not erase the many faults of the volume (i. . vulgarity, silliness). He goes on to state that these attributes are not in themselves worth any value, and therefore shouldn’t be seen as (aesthetic) virtues in any case. After this introduction, he moves on to the poems in question, and concludes that Wordsworth’s volume has settled the argument concerning literary merit in a definite way – so definite, in fact, that Jeffrey washes his hands, so to speak, and places the matter before the public (as if it weren’t already there), to decide for themselves whether Wordsworth’s Poems are worth something or not. Following this verdict, Jeffrey starts illustrating his opinion by moralizing about poetry in general, defining it as something that gives the reader â€Å"pleasure†, which can be divided into three parts: „that which we receive from the excitement of Passion or emotion — that which is derived from the play of Imagination, or the easy exercise of Reason — and that which depends on the character and qualities the Diction. † Diction, it seems, deserved some further introduction, for apparently this is what Jeffrey found most lacking in Poems. It becomes clear that in the critic’s opinion, true diction is elegant, dignified, appropriate – today we would probably add, conventional. The review laments the disuse of diction in the Lakeside fraternity, the disregard of classical sources and preference for the ordinary, the mundane. This latter tendency is also pointed out in relation to Poems’ topics, where Jeffrey emphasizes that the everyday subjects mentioned cannot actually be admitted as touching or sublime with a straight face. In his conclusion, Jeffrey admits that Wordsworth’s talents do shine through most of his works, making it doubly disappointing that they have to make do with such â€Å"trash†, and finishes by expressing a hope for the abortion of such â€Å"violation of the established laws of poetry†. Looking at the review from a stylistic point of view, Jeffrey is not as outspoken as he will be on following occasions, choosing instead to provide a poetical background philosophy to justify his negative impressions. Towards the end, however, he narrows his range of vision more and more from the general to the particular; and we can see the moraliser turn gradually into the critic, who doesn’t veil or justify his opinions thoroughly, but chooses rather to present them forcibly, with strong words and expressions (e. g. trash, folly, etc. ). Structurally speaking, the review is well-built, and conveys a false impression of impartiality with its units of refutation, exploration and conclusion, while in fact the personal opinion of the critic can clearly be felt in every instance of his well-composed sentences. But this, of course, was Jeffrey’s forte – to insinuate his own feelings even when seeming completely neutral. This tendency can well be observed also in the review of Wordsworth’s Memorials of a Tour, published in 1822. Note that fifteen years have passed, a significant period of time in contemporary literature – the new-fangled notions to which Jeffrey had objected previously had grown roots, even flourished somewhat; however, the opposition never altered its opinion: probably the most famous review of Jeffrey on Wordsworth, the one concerning The Excursion (published in 1814), opening with the line â€Å"This will never do! , is the best example of them still maintaining differences. During these years, Jeffrey used his wit and sarcasm to great effect, succeeding in shaking the reputations of Wordsworth and others considerably, albeit giving them considerable publicity at the same time. This review, however, is slightly different – although stil l wittily disapproving, it again includes the reader significantly, much like the one previously mentioned. Jeffrey – always a man of spectacular openers – starts off with the sentence: â€Å"The Lake School of Poetry, we think, is now pretty nearly extinct. . No gentlemanly reserve in his tone now – he follows up by separating Wordsworth from the fraternity, disclosing that now even they won’t admit him as belonging to them (though how someone could â€Å"belong† to a dead fraternity stays undecided), owing to his backward style, which even the inserted phrases of Milton or the Holy Writ can’t help (Jeffrey’s appreciation of these venerable sources clearly shines through his words on the subject). The second paragraph explains that while most of the compositions begin promisingly, the misguided author mostly succeeds in ruining them by saying nothing, or – even worse – by saying something totally ordinary in an â€Å"unintelligible way†, which, it seems, is one of the major sins against poetry itself. It soon becomes clear that the main concern of Jeffrey is that the sonnets of which the Memorial is composed are puzzling, and hard to understand; that Wordsworth insists on choosing the most unworthy objects to evoke startling fantasies or visions; and most of all, that the politics of the author leave much to be required. For a large part of the review is devoted to a sarcastic account of how Wordsworth depicted Napoleon, and how his sources for political and historical facts mainly consist of newspapers (the Morning Post is specifically mentioned). Following this, even the author’s reference to Milton becomes an object for derision (â€Å"Of a truth, it is a dangerous experiment in Mr. Wordsworth to recall his reader’s notice to Milton when he writes sonnets. †). Loftiness and high emotion are interpreted as pretension and impotence; however, Jeffrey again points out that even this volume has its merits, and that gems of beauty can indeed be found â€Å"†¦when [the author] is pleased to be plain and rational†. This review differs slightly from the previous one in style – Jeffrey does not give reasons for his verdicts any more, but declares his opinion in a straight, and sometimes still respectful manner. He constantly refers to contemporary matters, from affairs of the life of Wordsworth himself (Stamp-office) to the knowledge of the reader about important dates. We can see that this is a somewhat different approach than before – in 1807, he called on the reader to act as a dignified judge of literary value; now, he speaks out to him as a friend, someone with knowledge and experience similar to his own. The linguistic style of the review emphasizes this familiarity by often choosing sarcasm instead of elegance, or maybe not even that, just â€Å"plain† speech, only using flowing phrases when the context requires it. This tendency – although significant – is unsurprising, given that Jeffrey and his readership had, by now, more than fifteen years to grow familiar in. The single largest factor which ties both reviews together is, of course, the undervaluation of Wordsworth as a poet. One might well ask that how could a critic, any critic, of such taste and pedigree not recognize the genius of Wordsworth, and still be remembered by following generations as a critic of any value. There could be many answers to this question: one could simply shrug it off by saying contemporary critics very rarely discover the true talents of their times; or that Jeffrey’s enjoyable style is worthy of remembrance anywhere, notwithstanding his misjudged opinions. We could even say that badmouthing Wordsworth was Jeffrey’s one most significant achievement, which in itself constitutes a right to be remembered. The truth, however, lies somewhere deeper than that. For the reason to remember Jeffrey is Wordsworth himself – it is generally accepted that the critic’s judgements affected not only the criticized works’ afterlives, but the poet’s work as well. Wordsworth didn’t heed Jeffrey’s intimations, but they affected him slightly; he responded to the attacks, and defended himself as well as he could, on all grounds Jeffrey has challenged him: morality, philosophy, aesthetics and ethics, stating that contemporary reception cannot serve as a guideline for the future, but should be moulded and refined enough to accept these compositions according to their value. And so the symbiosis continued, with the works of Jeffrey and Wordsworth – although different in genre – growing ever more interconnected. And this is the most important reason why we have to remember Jeffrey: his impact on the Lake Poet’s work will last for ever, even when sarcasm seems outdated, classical references tedious, and elaborate language unnecessary. We can conclude that Jeffrey, even if he hadn’t managed to recognize Wordsworth, stated his opinion in a way worthy of his foe – noone needs to be ashamed of him; for although his sense of humour was limited, his humility likewise, and his ability to pinpoint immortal values a bit shoddy, he was – and remains – a force to be reckoned with. An eternal reminder that, whatever our opinions are, they will always have value and impact towards the one they are aimed at.

How to Write in APA Style

How to Write in APA Style On this episode, we discuss how to write and format a paper in APA style, which is most commonly used in scientific writing and social sciences writing in subjects like criminology, anthropology, and psychology.Specifically, we address the following topics:What is APA style?Why do we use APA style?What are the basic formatting rules? For example, it should be written in 12-point font, be double spaced, and have 1-inch margins all around.What are some APA abbreviation rules? For example, do not put periods in between letters of abbreviations unless its a Latin abbreviation or the words U.S. or U.K.How should I use charts and graphs in APA style? For example, text within charts and figures must be Sans Serif and be between 8 to 14-point font in size.What should my title page look like? For example, it should include the papers title, authors name, and institutions name centered and in title case.What is an abstract and what should it look like? For example, the Abstract paragraph is in 12-point font and is double spaced.What should in-text citations look like? For example, in-text citations should include the authors last name followed by the year of publication.How should the references page be formatted? For example, References should be centered at the top, without bold, italics, or underlining.

Media studies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Media studies - Essay Example Thus, scholars place information online where people can search and find such information. Digital search has changed in terms of sophistication and capability of search techniques and practices, which have evolved in tandem as they expand the search culture. Such has led to overtaking of the normal library search for scholars and individuals in different regions and locations. This is evident in the development of the Google android system, which enables individuals to use mobile phones as the means of searching for information. The search culture is also integrated in the global position system, which enables individuals to use their mobile devices to locate different areas. The education sector has also adopted the culture of search from Google. This is evidenced by the tutors who give assignments and tasks to students and requests such students to engage with Google and search for detailed information. Hence, Google has been able to create a unique culture, which has the common denominator of searching for information via the online